Liars, Cheaters and Thieves
What’s the world coming to huh?Â
What a disgusting display by people who are heroes to America’s youth. Roger Clemens bumbles and blubbers through his testimony in front of Congress. His accuser is a former cop turned trainer turned drug dealer. Andy Pettitte misremembers things about Clemens. This is months after Barry Bonds is indicted for lying to Congress when he was given a similar chance.
The TRUTH used to be an absolute. It used to mean a factual account of something that happened, or just is, or an honest account of something a person actually, really, no kidding did or believed. Now the truth is simply a convenient statement of something which cannot be disproven. If it suddenly becomes disprovable, just change it to something else, again and again until it comes to rest at something ultimately plausibly deniable.Â
I think this abherrant distortion of the TRUTH was popularized by former President Bill Clinton, who argued the meaning of the definition of the word “is” before a grand jury. But I’m not sure. I don’t want to give him more credit than he is due. Either way, that’s about the point in American history where the truth became something less absolute and more relative.
Back in college basketball, Indiana coach Kelvin Sampson faces sanctions for violation of five NCAA rules. What rules? One may ask?
The same rules he violated at Oklahoma. The same rules that put him on NCAA sanctions at Oklahoma.Â
Bobby Knight gets forced out of Hoosier country for being an abrasive, beligerent, codger. But he goes on to win 900 games and certain acceptance in the Hall of Fame.  I wouldn’t go so far as to call Bobby Knight a class act, but he was a great coach, was good for the game, and added color to every game he coached. And he made the press conferences worth sticking around for after the game. As a Kentucky Wildcat fan, I have every right to dislike the man. But I can’t. Because he was a great coach. And he wasn’t a cheater.Â
What was IU thinking? Tired of an incorrigible honest winner? Hire a known cheater? Yeah I know, there was a coach in between, but he was a wacko, so I’m skipping him to make a point.
So I have to ask myself, at what point does Congress feel the need to get involved in cheating?
Congress has made a lot of noise over Spygate, but to date they are not hauling in NFL coaches to testify before Congress. I doubt they will. The cheating in the NFL is sickening too, but apparently not as sickening as the pervasive meds cheating in MLB.  Congressmen are up to their necks in medicinal cheating in baseball. But why? Are they just sore about Barry Bonds lying to them and they want to poke him in the eye?
Is it because it is America’s pastime and they feel some need to show some sense of ownership of it?
Or is it that they get involved once the cheating and illegal drug use threatens to taint the sport to the point that legitimately talented athletes are being displaced by cheaters because they can’t compete using just their God given talents? That would set well with me. But if it is true, Congress’ arrival on the scene of horse racing is long overdue. Â
Regardless, I am absolutely sick of it. I’m tired of seeing sports heroes backpedal and plead the fifth and trample the truth.  To be quite honest, I’m tired of seeing sports figures testifying before Congress. Doesn’t Congress have something better to do? Isn’t there some lower court that could handle it? It is quite clear by now that if anyone thought that the power and authority of the Congress would extract the truth from these “heroes” they were wrong. It won’t. All the more reason to let someone else deal with it and let Congress make laws and deal with matters that ALL Americans have some concern about, like health care and social security and the war in Iraq.










